Theatre as Rorschach
Well, Doubt is done (look here for the critic’s view) and we’re moving onto Steve Martin’s adaptation of The Underpants. But before we leave Mr. Shanley’s tightly constructed piece, there’s an interesting phenomenon that we noticed during the talkbacks. Many of the audience members who hung around for the talkbacks (and I’d say that we had a much larger percentage of the audience want to chat than usual) were very interested in arriving at a verdict: Did he or didn’t he (did Father Flynn molest the student, or not). At one of the first talkbacks, it was interesting to note that it split mostly along gender lines: the vast majority of women sided with Sister Aloysius (the nun who accused the priest), while the vast majority of men thought that Father Flynn was innocent and that he had been unfairly persecuted by Sister Aloysius. Going forward, we were very interested to see if the gender-based trend continued. Did it? Nope, not really.
After that first talkback, it settled down to a pretty even mix of men and women who came down on either side of the verdict discussion. And another group (and totally unprompted by me, I promise) who argued that the ultimate “point” of Doubt is not what you think the truth is, but a challenge to embrace uncertainty and doubt. Was this group sizey? Nope, not at all. But even among the verdict crowd, it was interesting to hear people talk about how their backgrounds influenced their thinking on the matter. One man had been a school administrator for over 30 years, and he identified very strongly with Sister Aloysius’ instincts concerning Father Flynn. A woman talked about a personal experience when she had been unfairly persecuted when explaining why she sided with Father Flynn.
That got me thinking about more global issues of theatre and art in general. Rene Copeland, Doubt director and Tennessee Rep Artistic Director, talks about one of the greatest aims of theatre being to engender empathy in the audience–to touch an audience, to move them and make them think not only about what they see but also about themselves. This idea of theatre as Rorschach test is a powerful one for me. In my view, the ultimate fulfillment of theatre is not in the performance; if that were true, we could keep the theatre’s doors closed and run a show to our hearts’ content sans audience. No, the true fulfillment of theatre comes not with how the actors, directors, and designers feel about what is being done on stage; the highest aim of theatre is how the audience feels about it–what it makes them think, how, and if, it changes them, even for a moment–and the beauty of one audience member feeling a certain way about a play, and the person sitting right next to them feeling totally different. Just like the inkblots–that one person may look at and see a bee sitting on a flower, another may see a dragon soaring across the sun–our individual personalities, backgrounds, and experiences affect how we react to what we see. In this way, theatre can engender empathy not only in the different lives an audience witnesses on stage, but also when recognizing the different reactions among the people sharing in their experience.

And after the controversy and vase-shattering of The Goat, Tennessee Rep’s next production is a subtle, intricate, but no less fascinating piece of theatre: Doubt. This fabulously wrought play is set in a Catholic parish and school in 1964. The principal, a stern, authoritarian nun named Sister Aloysius, comes to suspect (with growing and fervent certainty) that the young, progressive, charismatic priest, Father Flynn, has or is plotting to molest a 12-year-old male student in the school.



And the new year finds us exploring Edward Albee’s controversial, emotionally-charged The Goat or, Who is Sylvia? in which a highly-educated, highly-successful, married architect falls genuinely in love with a goat. But when trying to find out what this play is truly “about” and why Tennessee Rep has it on its season, I turned to the talented cast and director.